Teeth aren't as unique to a person compare to fingerprinst, but dental evidence can be crucial in establishing a person's identity. The size of teeth indicates to a person's approximate age because of how fast teeth grow -- about four micrometers a day.
IT BELONGED TO HERMAN HARTONO!
- or his son.
Why? But before that, picture 2.
- or his son.
Why? But before that, picture 2.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjK-XZfWCu52USoiNlaaM4OjbcMCTLC315WRcPqqCd_qSFaNINClKaTqksyJNOpyVdfvX-12WWFcLbjb11J1UylF1BLxIBUaIW3VlEggeVw0C7E7p_ZPJ5IdtWdMt57Q2XFs5Hwcu710-I/s320/Picture+2.jpg)
These 3 different views of the teeth show the 1st, 2nd and 3rd respectively. How do we know? Here's why:
1. Primary mandibular first molar
- Largest posterior teeth
- It has 4 cusps
- Presence of transverse ridge joining mesiolingual and distobuccal cusp
- Resembles permanent mandibular first molar but smaller
- It has 5 cusps :3 buccal -mesiobuccal, distobuccal, distal and 2 lingual cusps
3. Third mandibular molar
- Smallest among the tree molars
And since 3rd molars are only present in adults, chances are this jaw also could've belonged to the once living Herman Hartono or his son.
Primary mandibular canine
- Has sharp cusp tips
- The mesial slope is shorter than the distal slope of the tooth
Since there are no other child skull fragments found, it can be also assumed that Adi Hartono is aged 17 years of age or more since the 3rd molar is present in both adult dentition in picture 1 & 2. However, at this point, whether it belonged to the father or son, is still unclear.
Further reading:
THE END.
what a wonderful job you've done! you can identify the victims by evaluate the teeth from the picture. So proud of you guys..
ReplyDeleteYEAY!=D
ReplyDeleteHaha happy ^^ thanks for the comment!
ReplyDelete